The Atlantic Journal ran an article on Zell Miller. The writer said he had been disappointed in Zell; and is even more disgusted with him because he is honoring the Swift Boat Vets who have already been "discredited".

Discredited? When was this? Did I miss something during the election? I think not. Neal Boortz blogs:

DISCREDITED? DISCREDITED HOW?

The following "vent" appeared in todays Atlanta Journal Constitution

I didn't think Zell could outrage me more than he already has, but when he honors the discredited Swift Boat Veterans .

I've been hearing this nonsense for months. It was the media mantra during the final months of the campaign. The Swift Boat Veterans were constantly assailed for their "proven lies" and labeled as "discredited."

Excuse me for asking, but just what were those "provable lies?" In just what way were the Swiftees "discredited?" If you go back and review the news stories from the campaign you will find that virtually none of the charges brought against John Kerry by the Swift Boat Veterans were discredited. No lies were revealed. It was the Kerry camp, not the Swiftees, that was constantly changing its story as new facts were revealed.

I join Zell Miller in honoring the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth. Without them we might be looking at a John Kerry inauguration in a few weeks. Thanks, guys.

Heavyhanded says ditto.