The New York Times says it's good John Bolton is leaving his diplomatic post. Of course, they opposed him having that post to begin with.
"Mr. Bolton's withdrawal gives the president a chance to improve his relationship with both the U.N. and Congress. There are plenty of experienced, internationalist Republicans who could get near-unanimous support in the Senate and send a signal to the world that Mr. Bush understands that the United States is not the only nation on the planet whose opinion matters."
It seems to me that the NYT has forgotten one small fact: His job is to represent the U.S., and its' interests, and not all the other countries around the globe. But why let little details such as this get in their way. They don't believe in America, nor factual information for that matter. Why should this matter be any different.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home