Growing nuclear threat
United Press International
"WASHINGTON -- According to the British counter-intelligence group MI-5, over 360 private companies, university departments, and government organizations in eight countries, including Israel, Syria, Pakistan, Iran, India, Egypt, the Pakistani High Commission in London, and the United Arab Emirates, have been procuring nuclear technology and equipment for use in nuclear weapons construction."
Read on....
"WASHINGTON -- According to the British counter-intelligence group MI-5, over 360 private companies, university departments, and government organizations in eight countries, including Israel, Syria, Pakistan, Iran, India, Egypt, the Pakistani High Commission in London, and the United Arab Emirates, have been procuring nuclear technology and equipment for use in nuclear weapons construction."
Read on....
posted by HeavyHanded at
11:17 AM
3 Comments:
You have left me speechless Louis.
By
HeavyHanded, at 7:00 PM
What nonsense. We know exactly what the results were of the 2000 Presidential Election. George W. Bush won. He did so in precise accordance with the governing rules and regulations in effect at the time and which remain unchanged to this day. He did so dispite the many county recounts requested by Al Gore and his supporters. We also know that he still would have won if each and every Florida county recount requested by Al Gore and his supporters had actually taken place. Some have said that Al Gore may have won if all of the votes in the entire State of Florida had been recounted but no one requested that be done and so we do not know. Nor would we know even then what the results would have been if a recount of all of the votes throughout the entire country had been recounted. In either case we further do not know what the consequences would have been for the election to have remained undetermined for the length of time it would have taken to continue with the repetitive recount process.
That, apparently, is why Liberals so dislike hard and fast written rules and regulations, such as the U.S. Constitution, least they require a conclusion contrary to what Liberals might prefer at any point in time.
As to Israel, you may judge them to be a criminal state if you will but it would remain a judgment on your part and, as we all know, Liberals do not make judgments. Israel has, at various times in its history and only upon being attacked by certain of its neighbors, conquered some adjoining lands in order to lessen its vulnerability to future attacks by those same neighbors. With the exception of the Golan Heights, it has returned all of that conquered territory to its neighbors and vacated from them it’s own citizens, at gunpoint if necessary, only to have those same territories be immediately reused as launching points for the very repeated attacks from which Israel first sought to protect itself with it’s previous occupation of them.
Israel exists as and because the United Nations created it in 1949. Israel has had to defend itself only because the United Nations, thereafter, had not the means, desire, conviction nor courage to backup its own decision. If you want a villain in the Israeli/Mideast mess, you need look no further than the United Nations. It created the situation and remains impotent to resolve it. Instead, the U.S. and Israel are supposed to place their own sovereignty in the ineffectual hands of this same shameful organization because, this time ‘round, Liberals believe that would result in circumstances more to their liking.
First it was 'never again'. Then it became 'never happened'. Now it is 'not yet'.
By
Anonymous, at 2:56 PM
Nonsense, indeed.
I just did not have the inclination at the time to respond. To respond fully would have required more time and effort than I feel is justified.
I did not see any hope of any return of investment for what would have been a considerable investment of time.
I will say however that the first thing that jumped out at me was putting our "failed" (as Louis sees it) 2000 elections within the same context as nuclear weapons being in the possession of "criminal" or "dictatorial" states.
Liberals have a real problem with gradations. If they determine some thing or, some situation, is wrong, it cannot be any "more" wrong than some other predetermined injustice.
All inequities or injustices are the same to them regardless of context. With them, one grievous act is the same as another.
For those who do not believe in God, what I am about to say will mean nothing to them:
But I believe some sins are worse than others; not all sins are as "bad" as some others.
My proof is the bible and the ten commandments. The bible brings attention to many sins. The ten commandments are only 10 sins. What would be the purpose of having the ten commandments if they were no more important or grievous than all the others in the bible?
It would appear, Louis, that you fit this description. You have left me little to go on, but it appears you think (if we were to accept your premise) that a botched election is just as bad as nuclear weapons in the hands of countries that wish us ill will.
By
HeavyHanded, at 5:27 PM
Post a Comment
<< Home